Special Article
Guidelines for
the Medical Management of Osteoarthritis
Part
II. Osteoarthritis of the Knee
Marc C. Hochberg,
Roy D. Altman, Kenneth D. Brandt, Bruce M. Clark, Paul A. Dieppe, Marie
R. Griffin, Roland W. Moskowitz, And Thomas J. Schnitzer
Osteoarthritis (OA),
previously called degenerative joint disease, is the most prevalent form
of arthritis in the United States (1). Clinically, patients with OA of
the knee have pain in and around the knee that is typically worse with
weight-bearing and improved with rest, morning stiffness, and gel phenomenon,
and, on physical examination, often have tenderness to palpation, bony
enlargement, crepitus on motion, and/or limitation of joint motion.
Unlike rheumatoid
arthritis and other inflammatory arthritides, inflammation, if present,
is usually mild. Although the causes of OA of the knee are not always
known, biomechanical stresses affecting the articular cartilage and subchondral
bone and biochemical changes in the articular cartilage and synovial membrane
are important in its pathogenesis (2-4).
Guidelines for the
medical management of patients with OA of the hip are reported in an accompanying
article (5). Herein, we present guidelines for the medical management
of patients with OA of the knee. Because many of the specific approaches
are common between these two conditions, the reader is referred to the
guidelines for OA of the hip for a detailed discussion (5). Differences
in approach and treatment strategies which are unique to OA of the knee,
including the role of intraarticular corticosteroid injections, will be
discussed.
Specific recommendations
for surgical management of OA of the knee, however, are not included.
Goals of
management
The goals of management
of patients with OA of the knee are identical to those for patients with
OA of the hip. Before considering therapeutic options in an individual
with OA of the knee, the physician must be certain that the patient's
knee pain is indeed attributable to OA. For instance, it is not infrequent
for an individual with a periarticular disorder such as anserine, infrapatellar,
or prepatellar bursitis to be treated erroneously for knee OA. In some
patients with disorders of the spine and hip, pain can be referred to
the knee.
Therefore, it is
essential that OA of the knee be established as the basis for the patient's
signs and symptoms before beginning therapy.
The American College
of Rheumatology criteria for the classification of OA of the knee have
excellent precision for identification of patients with symptomatic OA
of the knee (Table 1) (6). If the physician is in doubt about the diagnosis
of OA, consultation with a rheumatologist should be sought.
Table
1. American College of Rheumatology classification criteria
for osteoarthritis of the knee*
|
Traditional
format
Knee pain and
radiographic osteophytes and at least 1 of the following 3 items:
Age >50
years
Morning stiffness <=30 minutes in duration
Crepitus on motion
|
Classification
tree
Knee pain and
radiographic osteophytes
or
Knee pain and age >=40 years and morning stiffness <=30 minutes
in duration and crepitus on motion
* Modified from
ref. 6. |
The treatment modalities
currently available in the United States for the medical management of
patients with OA of the knee are listed in Table 2. As with OA of the
hip, the treatment plan must be individualized and should be based on
numerous factors, including the presence of such comorbid conditions as
hypertension, heart disease, peptic ulcer disease, or kidney disease,
which influence decisions about drug therapy.
Table
2. Medical management of patients with osteoarthritis of
the knee*
|
Nonpharmacologic
therapy
Patient education
Self management
programs (e.g., Arthritis Self-Help Course)
Health professional
social support via telephone contact
Weight loss (if overweight)
Physical therapy
Range of
motion exercises
Quadriceps strengthening exercises
Assistive devices for ambulation
Occupational
therapy
Joint protection
and energy conservation
Assistive devices for ADLs and IADLs
Aerobic exercise
programs
|
Pharmacologic
therapy
Intraarticular
steroid injections
Non-opioid analgesics (e.g., acetaminophen)
Topical analgesics (e.g., capsaicin and methylsalicylate creams)
Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs
Opioid analgesics (e.g., propoxyphene, codeine, oxycodone)
* ADLs = activities
of daily living; IADLs = instrumental ADLs. |
Nonpharmacologic
therapy
The components of
nonpharmacologic therapy and the central role of the physical and occupational
therapist in the management of patients with OA of the knee are identical
to those used in patients with OA of the hip (5). The role of exercise
in the management of OA of the knee has been reviewed by others (7-9).
Three randomized controlled trials in patients with knee OA demonstrated
that strengthening of quadriceps musculature with either isometric or
isotonic, resistive exercises was associated with significant improvement
in quadriceps strength, knee pain, and function, when compared with controls
(10-12). If the patient cannot participate in an organized exercise program,
the primary care physician should ensure that all patients with OA of
the knee are instructed in quadriceps strengthening exercises.
Proper use of a
cane (in the hand contralateral to the affected knee) reduces loading
forces on the joint and is associated with decreased pain and improved
function (13). In addition, patients may benefit from shoe inserts to
correct abnormal biomechanics due to angular deformities of the knees
(14). Although no trial data are available, the wearing of shock-absorbing
shoes with insoles is believed to be of benefit. Another useful maneuver
for patients with OA of the knee who have symptomatic patellofemoral compartment
involvement is medial taping of the patella (15). Finally, the use of
light-weight knee braces may also be helpful in patients with tibiofemoral
disease, especially if complicated by lateral instability (16).
Aerobic conditioning
exercises have been found to be feasible and efficacious in individuals
with OA of the knee (17). In addition, a supervised fitness walking program
combined with patient education was shown to be of benefit in patients
with knee OA (18). A program of aerobic activity, particularly an aquatic
program such as that sponsored by the Arthritis Foundation, should be
suggested to all patients with OA of the knee to improve functional status
and reduce pain. These exercise programs, however, require a commitment
of time and effort on the part of the patient.
Several epidemiologic
studies have found that obesity is a major risk factor for the development
and progression of knee OA (for review, see ref. 19), and, in one study,
weight loss was associated with lower odds of developing symptomatic knee
OA in women (20). Whether weight loss will slow the progression of or
alleviate symptoms in patients with existing OA of the knee is not known.
Nonetheless, overweight patients with OA of the knee, especially if they
are being considered as candidates for total knee arthroplasty (see below)
should be encouraged to participate in a comprehensive weight management
program including dietary counseling and aerobic exercise. Specific dietary
therapy and other unproven therapies are not recommended in the management
of patients with OA of the knee (21).
Pharmacologic
therapy
The principles of
pharmacologic therapy for relieving pain and other symptoms in patients
with OA of the knee are similar to those for patients with OA of the hip
(5). Areas covered in those guidelines which are not discussed in this
paper include the possible adverse effects of acetaminophen, use of other
oral analgesics, use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs),
and strategies for the prevention of NSAID-associated ulcer disease and
gastrointestinal bleeding.
In patients with
OA of the knee who have an effusion and local signs of inflammation, judicious
use of intraarticular corticosteroid injections is appropriate (Figure
1) (22). When joints are painful and swollen, aspiration of fluid, followed
by intraarticular injection of a corticosteroid preparation (e.g., triamcinolone
acetonide or hexacetonide at a dose of 40 mg) is an effective short-term
method of decreasing pain (23) and increasing quadriceps strength (24).
Injection can be used as monotherapy in selected patients or as an adjunct
to systemic therapy (see below). Joints should be aspirated/injected using
aseptic technique, and fluid should be sent for cell counts and Gram stain
and culture if infection is suspected (25). On occasion, patients may
experience a mild flare of synovitis related to a reaction to the crystalline
suspensions; however, these postinjection flares are short-lived. The
risk of introducing infection into an osteoarthritic joint using standard
aseptic technique is exceedingly small.
Figure 1. Medical management of patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis
of the knee. qid = 4 times a day; UGI = upper gastrointestinal (tract).
It is generally
recommended, although not well supported by published data, that injection
of corticosteroids in a given joint not be performed more than 3-4 times
in a given year because of concern about the possible development of progressive
cartilage damage through repeated injection in the weight-bearing joints
(22). Most individuals who require more than 3-4 intraarticular injections
per year to control symptoms are probably candidates for joint lavage
or surgical intervention.
The non-opioid,
simple analgesic, acetaminophen, is the initial drug of choice for systemic
treatment of symptomatic OA of the knee (Figure 1).
Several short- and
long-term studies have shown that acetaminophen, in doses up to 4,000
mg/day, is superior to placebo and comparable in efficacy to both ibuprofen
and naproxen in the management of patients with OA of the knee (26-29).
Since other NSAIDs have not been shown to have superior effectiveness
compared with ibuprofen or naproxen in the treatment of patients with
OA of the knee, acetaminophen should be considered the preferred first-line
therapy for patients with symptomatic OA of the knee.
In individuals with
OA of the knee who do not respond to oral analgesics or do not wish to
take systemic therapy, the use of topical analgesics, e.g., methylsalicylate
or capsaicin cream, is appropriate as either adjunctive or monotherapy,
respectively (30, 31). Capsaicin cream must be applied to the symptomatic
joint 4 times daily; a local burning sensation is common, but this rarely
leads to discontinuation of therapy.
If the patient fails
to respond to acetaminophen or other oral or topical analgesics, the use
of an NSAID is indicated. The clinical pharmacology of NSAIDs in OA is
reviewed elsewhere (32).
In individuals with
OA of the knee who have not responded satisfactorily to the nonpharmacologic
and pharmacologic modalities outlined above, and in whom surgery is to
be avoided or is medically contraindicated, consultation with a rheumatologist
should be sought. In such patients, other modalities may be appropriate,
but cannot be routinely recommended. Closed tidal knee irrigation with
saline can be performed in an ambulatory setting under local anesthesia.
This procedure mimics the lavage affect of arthroscopy. Saline is infused
into the knee to distend the capsule, and the fluid is then withdrawn.
This process is
repeated several times until a total volume of 2 liters has been infused
and removed. Theoretically, such tidal irrigation disrupts intraarticular
adhesions and mobilizes debris and inflammatory cytokines from the entire
joint. Ike et al performed a randomized single-blind 14-week parallel
trial of tidal irrigation compared with standard medical therapy in 77
patients with OA of the knee (33). Tidal irrigation resulted in statistically
significant improvement in patients' assessment of joint stiffness and
pain after a 50-foot walk. The lack of a comparable control group in that
study, however, makes it difficult to determine the role of a possible
placebo effect.
Arthroscopic lavage,
with or without debridement, may also be useful in certain patients with
OA of the knee, especially those individuals who have concomitant meniscal
disease or symptoms of locking of the knee (34). Chang and colleagues
randomized 32 patients with OA of the knee to either arthroscopic surgery
or closed-needle tidal irrigation (35). Overall, arthroscopic lavage and
debridement was no better than tidal irrigation alone in the relief of
pain and dysfunction in the knees of these patients. Improvement after
arthroscopy was more likely, however, in those patients who had a meniscal
tear than in those who had no internal derangement.
Investigational
therapy
Several experimental
therapies that are not currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration
for use in patients with OA of the knee have been studied by rheumatologists
and others in recent years, and some have shown promise as either slow-acting
symptomatic drugs or disease-modifying anti-OA drugs (36). A discussion
of these agents is beyond the scope of the present guidelines (for a review
of these agents, see ref. 37); however, based on the results of ongoing
clinical trials, it is recognized that these guidelines may require revision
if one or more of these agents is approved for marketing.
Surgical
treatment
Patients with severe
symptomatic OA of the knee who have pain that has failed to respond to
medical therapy and progressive limitation in ADLs should be referred
to orthopedic surgeons for evaluation (2,38). Osteotomy, in appropriately
selected individuals, provides pain relief and may prevent progression
of disease in patients who are not yet considered to be candidates for
total joint arthroplasty. Total joint arthroplasty provides marked pain
relief and functional improvement in the vast majority of patients with
OA of the knee. Outcomes are dependent on the timing of the surgery, the
number of procedures that the surgeon and the hospital have performed,
and the patient's preoperative medical status, peri- and postoperative
management, and rehabilitation (39,40).
Summary
Treatment of patients
with OA of the knee should be individualized and tailored to the severity
of the symptoms. In individuals with mild symptomatic OA, treatment may
be limited to patient education, physical and occupational therapy and
other nonpharmacologic modalities, and pharmacologic therapy including
non-opioid oral and topical analgesics.
In patients who
are unresponsive to this treatment regimen, the use of NSAIDs in addition
to nonpharmacologic therapy is appropriate unless medically contraindicated.
Judicious use of intraarticular steroid injections has a role either as
monotherapy or an adjunct to systemic therapy in patients with knee OA
who have symptomatic effusions. The role of joint lavage and arthroscopic
debridement in patients with OA of the knee who are unresponsive to conservative
medical therapy needs further study, and these procedures cannot be routinely
recommended for all patients at this time. Patients with severe symptomatic
OA of the knee require an aggressive approach to decreasing pain, increasing
mobility, and decreasing functional impairment; such patients may benefit
from orthopedic consultation and evaluation for osteotomy or total joint
arthroplasty.
REFERENCES
1. Scott JC, Hochberg
MC: Arthritic and other musculoskeletal diseases. In, Chronic Disease
Epidemiology and Control. Edited by RC Brownson, PL Remington, JR Davis.
Washington, DC, American Public Health Association, 1993
2. Goldberg VM,
Ketteldamp DB, Colyer RA: Osteoarthritis of the knee. In, Osteoarthritis:
Diagnosis and Medical/Surgical Management. Edited by RW Moskowitz, DS
Howell, VM Goldberg, HJ Mankin. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1992
3. Mow VC, Setton
LA, Guilak F, Ratcliffe A: Mechanical factors in articular cartilage and
their role in osteoarthritis. In, Osteoarthritic Disorders. Edited by
K Kuettner, V Goldberg. Rosemont, IL, American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons,
1995
4. Poole AR: Imbalances
of anabolism and catabolism of cartilage matrix components in osteoarthritis.
In, Osteoarthritic Disorders. Edited by K Kuettner, V Goldberg. Rosemont,
IL, American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, 1995
5. Hochberg MC,
Altman RD, Brandt KD, Clark BM, Dieppe PA, Griffin MR, Moskowitz RW, Schnitzer
TJ: Guidelines for the medical management of osteoarthritis. Part I. Osteoarthritis
of the hip. Arthritis Rheum 38:1535-1540, 1995
6. Altman R, Asch
E, Bloch D, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K, Christy W, Cooke TD, Greenwald
R, Hochberg M, Howell D, Kaplan D, Koopman W, Longley S III, Mankin H,
McShane DJ, Medsger T Jr, Meenan R, Mikkelsen W, Moskowitz R, Murphy W,
Rothschild B, Segal M, Sokoloff L, Wolfe F: Development of criteria for
the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis: classification of
osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 29:1039-1049, 1986
7. Puett DW, Griffin
MR: Published trials of nonmedicinal and noninvasive therapies for hip
and knee osteoarthritis. Ann Intern Med 121:133-140, 1994
8. Minor MA: Exercise
in the management of osteoarthritis of the knee and hip. Arthritis Care
Res 7:198-204, 1994
9. Ettinger WH Jr,
Afable RF: Physical disability from knee osteoarthritis: the role of exercise
as an intervention. Med Sci Sports Exerc 26:1435-1440, 1994
10. Jan MH, Lai
JS: The effects of physiotherapy on osteoarthritic knees of females. J
Formos Med Assoc 90:1008-1013, 1993
11. Chamberlain
MA, Care G, Harfield B: Physiotherapy in osteoarthrosis of the knees:
a controlled trial of hospital versus home exercises. Int Rehabil Med
4:101-106, 1982
12. Feinberg J,
Marzouk D, Sokolek C, Katz B, Bradley J, Brandt K: Effects of isometric
versus range of motion exercise on joint pain and function in patients
with knee osteoarthritis (abstract). Arthritis Rheum 35 (suppl 5):R28,
1992
13. Blount WP: Don't
throw away the cane. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 38:695-698, 1956
14. Sasaki T, Yasuda
K: Clinical evaluation of the treatment of osteoarthritic knee with a
wedged insole. Clin Orthop Rel Res 221:181-187, 1987
15. Cushnaghan J,
McCarthy C, Dieppe PA: Taping the patella medially: a new treatment for
osteoarthritis of the knee joint? Br Med J 1988;308:753-755
16. Rubin G, Dixon
M, Danisi M: Prescription procedures for knee orthosis and knee-ankle-foot
orthosis. Orthotics Prosthetics 31:15, 1977
17. Minor MA, Hewitt
JE, Webel RR, Anderson SK, Kay DR: Efficacy of physical conditioning exercise
in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum
32: 1396-1405, 1989
18. Kovar PA, Allegrante
JP, MacKenzie R, Peterson MG, Gutin B, Charlson ME. Supervised fitness
walking in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Ann Intern Med 116:529-534,
1992
19. Silman AJ, Hochberg
MC: Epidemiology of the Rheumatic Diseases. Oxford, Oxford University
Press, 1993
20. Felson DT, Zhang
Y, Anthony JM, Naimark A, Anderson JJ: Weight loss reduces the risk for
symptomatic osteoarthritis in women: the Framingham study. Ann Intern
Med 116:535-539, 1992
21. Panush RS: Is
there a role for diet or other questionable therapies in managing rheumatic
diseases? Bull Rheum Dis 42:1-4, 1993
22. Neustadt DH:
Intraarticular steroid therapy. In, Osteoarthritis: Diagnosis and Medical/Surgical
Management. Edited by RW Moskowitz, DS Howell, VM Goldberg, HJ Mankin.
Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1992
23. Dieppe PA, Sathapatayavongs
B, Jones HE, Bacon PA, Ring EFJ: Intra-articular steroids in osteoarthritis.
Rheum Rehabil 19:212-217, 1980
24. Fahrer H, Rentsch
HU, Gerber NJ, Beyeler C, Hess CW, Grunig B: Knee effusion and reflex
inhibition of the quadriceps. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 70:635-638, 1988
25. Gatter RA, Andrews
RP, Cooley DA, Fiechtner JJ, Minna DA, Phelps P, Wasner C: American College
of Rheumatology guidelines for performing office synovial fluid examinations.
J Clin Rheumatol 1:194-200, 1995
26. Amadio P Jr,
Cummings DM: Evaluation of acetominophen in the management of osteoarthritis
of the knee. Curr Ther Res 34:59-66, 1983
27. Bradley JD,
Brandt KD, Katz BP, Kalasinski LA, Ryan SL: Comparison of an inflammatory
dose of ibuprofen, an analgesic dose of ibuprofen, and acetaminophen in
the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med
325:87- 91, 1991
28. Williams HJ,
Ward JR, Egger MJ, Neuner R, Brooks RH, Clegg DO, Field EH, Skosey JL,
Alarcon GA, Willkens RF, Paulus HE, Russell IJ, Sharp JT: Comparison of
naproxen and acetaminophen in a two-year study of treatment of osteoarthritis
of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 36:1196-1206, 1993
29. Brandt KD: Should
osteoarthritis be treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs? Rheum
Dis Clin North Am 19:697- 712, 1993
30. Deal CL, Schnitzer
TJ, Lipstein E, Seibold JR, Stevens RM, Levy MD, Albert D, Renold F: Treatment
of arthritis with topical capsaicin: a double-blind trial. Clin Ther 13:383-395,
1991
31. Altman RD, Aven
A, Holmburg CE, Pfeifer LM, Sack M, Young GT: Capsaicin cream 0.025% as
monotherapy for osteoarthritis: a double-blind study. Semin Arthritis
Rheum 23 (suppl 3):25-33, 1994
32. Batchlor EE,
Paulus HE: Principles of drug therapy. In, Osteoarthritis: Diagnosis and
Medical/Surgical Management. Edited by RW Moskowitz, DS Howell, VM Goldberg,
HJ Mankin. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1992
33. Ike RW, Arnold
WJ, Rothschild EW, Shaw HL, and the Tidal Irrigation Cooperating Group:
Tidal irrigation versus conservative medical management in patients with
osteoarthritis of the knee: a prospective randomized study. J Rheumatol
19:772-779, 1992
34. Johnson LL,
editor: Diagnosis and Surgical Arthroscopy: The Knee and Other Joints.
Second edition. St. Louis, CV Mosby, 1981
35. Chang RW, Falconer
J, Stulberg SD, Arnold WJ, Manheim LM, Dyer AR: A randomized, controlled
trial of arthroscopic surgery versus closed-needle joint lavage for patients
with osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 36:289-296, 1993
36. McAlindon T,
Dieppe P: The medical management of osteoarthritis of the knee: an inflammatory
issue? Br J Rheumatol 29:471-473, 1990
37. Howell DS, Altman
RD, Pelletier JP: Disease modifying antirheumatic drugs: current state
of their application in animal models of osteoarthritis. In, Osteoarthritic
Disorders. Edited by K Kuettner, V Goldberg. Rosemont, IL, American Academy
of Orthopedic Surgeons, 1995
38. Buckwalter JA,
Lohmander S: Operative treatment of osteoarthrosis: current practice and
future development. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 76:1405-1418, 1994
39. Peterson MGE,
Hollenberg JP, Szatrowski TP, Johanson NA, Mancuso CA, Charlson ME: Geographic
variations in the rates of elective total hip and knee arthroplasties
among Medicare beneficiaries in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]
74:1530-1539, 1992
40. Lavernia CJ,
Guzman JF: Relationship of surgical volume to short-term mortality, morbidity,
and hospital charges in arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10:133-140, 1995
Supported by a grant
from the Arthritis Foundation. The Arthritis Foundation received an unrestricted
grant from McNeil Consumer Products Company. Approved by the Board of
Directors, American College of Rheumatology, July 8, 1995.
Marc C. Hochberg,
MD, MPH: the University of Maryland School of Medicine and Baltimore Veterans
Affairs Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland; Roy D. Altman, MD: the University
of Miami School of Medicine and Miami Veterans Affairs Medical Center,
Miami, Florida; Kennenth D. Brandt, MD: Indiana University School of Medicine,
Indianapolis, Indiana; Bruce M. Clark, CPT: The Mary Pack Arthritis Centre,
Vancouver, BC, Canada; Paul A. Dieppe, MD: the Bristol Royal Infirmary,
University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; Marie R. Griffin, MD, MPH: Vanderbilt
University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee; Roland W. Moskowitz,
MD: Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio;
Thomas J. Schnitzer, MD, PhD: Rush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois.
Address reprint
requests to the American College of Rheumatology, 1800 Century Place,
Suite 250, Atlanta, GA 30345.
|