Press Release
Media Contact: Betsy Boyd-Flynn
(404) 633-3777
(619) 525-6205
Embargoed For Release at 5:30 pm PT, Sunday Nov. 13, 2005
Arthritis News
GUIDE RESULTS TAP GLUCOSAMINE SULFATE AS PREFERRED MED FOR THE PAIN
OF KNEE OSTEO ARTHRITIS
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA –European GUIDE ( Glucosamine Unum In Die [once
a day] Efficacy) medical investigation results indicate that glucosamine
sulfate may have more ability to control pain due to knee osteoarthritis
than does acetaminophen, according to research presented this week at
the American College of Rheumatology Annual Scientific Meeting in San
Diego, California.
Glucosamine, which is dispensed as a prescription drug in Europe and
available as a dietary supplement in the U.S. , has been suggested to
improve cartilage biology and counteract factors contributing to joint
degeneration, inflammation and symptoms of osteoarthritis.
On-going randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials are being
conducted worldwide to assess the effectiveness of oral glucosamine in
combating the discomfort of knee osteoarthritis compared to standard symptomatic
medications . U.S. researchers from the National Institutes of Health
are utilizing GAIT (the Glucosamine/Chondroitin Arthritis Intervention
Trial) to compare nutraceutical glucosamine hydrochloride with the anti-inflammatory
celecoxib (Celebrex), dividing the glucosamine into three separate daily
doses.
European researchers, employing GUIDE , have been comparing glucosamine
sulfate with the typically-recommended acetaminophen which is usually
taken in three or four 1000 mg doses. The original prescription formulation
of glucosamine sulfate soluble powder used provided higher glucosamine
levels in the blood to mirror recent favorable glucosamine trials. (Glucosamine
sulfate is a slightly different substance than glucosamine hydrochloride.
The formulation used in GUIDE is not comparable to most formulations available
in the U.S.)
GUIDE investigators followed 318 patients (88 percent women) with symptomatic
knee osteoarthritis. Based on randomized groupings, patients took either
oral glucosamine sulfate soluble powder (1500 mg once a day), acetaminophen
(1000 mg tablets three times a day), or a placebo over a six-month period.
All groups were allowed ibuprofen as needed.
Results showed that both glucosamine sulfate and acetaminophen had greater
efficacy than placebo use in reducing pain. However, patients taking glucosamine
sulfate appeared to experience more relief than did those on acetaminophen.
“Once-daily 1500 mg oral doses of glucosamine sulfate might be the preferred
treatment for symptoms of knee osteoarthritis,” summarizes Gabriel Herrero-Beaumont,
MD, Director of the Rheumatology Department, Jiménez Díaz
Foundation - CAPIO, Madrid, Spain. “Based on these results, physicians
who typically recommended acetaminophen may well find their patients gain
more comfort taking glucosamine sulfate.”
The American College of Rheumatology is the professional organization
for rheumatologists and health professionals who share a
dedication to healing, preventing disability and curing arthritis and
related rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. For more information on
the ACR's annual meeting, see www.rheumatology.org/annual.
###
Editor's Notes: Dr. Herrero-Beaumont will present this research during
a scientific session at the ACR Annual Scientific Meeting from 4:30
pm – 6:00 pm PT on Tuesday November 15th, 2005 in Room 28 of the San
Diego Convention Center. He will be available for media questions and
briefing at 8:30am PT on Tuesday, November 15, in Room 23 A of the Convention
Center.
Presentation Number: 1203
Effects of Glucosamine Sulfate on 6-Month Control of Knee Osteoarthritis
Symptoms vs Placebo and Acetaminophen: Results from the Glucosamine Unum
in Die Efficacy (GUIDE) Trial
G. Herrero-Beaumont 1, JA Román 2, MC Trabado 3, FJ Blanco
4 , P. Benito 5, E. Martin-Mola 6, J. Paulino 7, JL Marenco 8, A.
Porto 9, A. Laffon 10, D. Araùjo 11, M. Figueroa 12, J. Branco
13. 1 Fund. J. Diaz, Madrid, Spain; 2 H Peset, Valencia, Spain; 3 H Clinic,
Barcelona, Spain; 4 CH Juan Canalejo, A Coruña, Spain; 5 H del
Mar, Barcelona, Spain; 6 H U La Paz, Madrid, Spain; 7 C H C R, Ciudad
Real, Spain; 8 H N.S. de Valme, Sevilla, Spain; 9 H U, Coimbra, Portugal;
10 H Princesa, Madrid, Spain; 11 H C. Bertiandos, Ponte de Lima, Portugal;
12 H Donostia, San Sebastian, Spain; 13 H E. Moniz, Lisboa, Portugal
Purpose: Two multicenter, randomised, placebo-controlled,
double-blind trials have been lately investigating the efficacy of oral
glucosamine in knee osteoarthritis (OA), using a symptomatic medication
as reference: GAIT performed by the NIH in the US with nutraceutical glucosamine
hydrochloride 500 mg t.i.d. vs celecoxib, and GUIDE performed in Europe
with the original prescription glucosamine sulfate 1500 mg once-a-day
(u.i.d.) vs acetaminophen, i.e. the preferred symptomatic medication in
OA practice guidelines. We report the results of GUIDE.
Methods: 318 patients (88% women) with knee OA (ACR criteria)
were randomised to double-dummy oral glucosamine sulfate soluble powder 1500
mg u.i.d., or acetaminophen 1000 mg tablets t.i.d. (3 g/day, as recommended
in Europe), or placebo, for 6 months. The rescue medication consisted of
standardised use of ibuprofen 400 mg tablets (daily diary recording). The
primary efficacy parameter was the 6-month change in the Lequesne index in
the ITT population, using the LOCF approach for patients not completing the
study according to the protocol (34 on placebo, 28 in each the acetaminophen
and glucosamine sulfate groups, without differences in drop-out reasons).
Secondary efficacy parameters included the changes in the WOMAC index and
the OARSI-A responder criteria. Statistical analysis on the indexes was performed
by GLM-ANOVA, with Dunnett's pairwise comparisons vs placebo. The proportions
of responders and patients using the rescue medication were compared by the
chi-square test.
Results: The groups were comparable for demographics and
baseline disease characteristics. Glucosamine sulfate efficacy vs placebo
was significant on all parameters (table). Acetaminophen had more responders
than placebo, but it failed to reach a significant difference on the Lequesne
(p=0.18) and WOMAC (p=0.077) indexes.
Baseline Lequesne and WOMAC, with 6-month ITT changes
and % of OARSI-A responders |
|
Placebo
(N= 104) |
Acetaminophen
(N=108) |
Glucosamine sulfate
(N=106) |
|
Baseline |
6 months |
Baseline |
6 months |
Baseline |
6 months |
Lequesne
(points) a |
10.8
(2.6) |
-1.9
(-2.6 to -1.2) |
11.1
(2.7) |
-2.7
(-3.3 to -2.1) |
11.0
(3.1) |
-3.1 *
(-3.8 to -2.3) |
WOMAC
(points) a |
37.9
(14.3) |
-8.2
(-11.3 to -5.1) |
40.4
(14.8) |
-12.3
(-14.9 to -9.7) |
38.3
(15.2) |
-12.9 †
(-15.6 to -10.1) |
OARSI-A responders (%) |
- |
21.2% |
- |
33.3% ‡ |
- |
39.6% § |
a Mean absolute (SD) at baseline and change (95%CI)
at 6 months.
P vs placebo: * 0.032 [difference = -1.2 (-2.3 to -0.8)]; † 0.039 [difference
= -4.7 (-9.1 to -0.2)]; ‡ 0.047; § 0.007 |
More patients on placebo used the rescue medication (p=0.027 and 0.045 vs glucosamine
sulfate and acetaminophen, respectively). There were no differences among
groups in safety.
Conclusions: Glucosamine sulfate at the oral once-daily
dose of 1500 mg might be the preferred symptomatic medication in knee
OA.
Disclosure: G. Herrero-Beaumont, Rottapharm 2; J.
Román, Rottapharm 2; M. Trabado,
Rottapharm 2; F. Blanco, Rottapharm 2; P.
Benito, Rottapharm 2; E. Martin-Mola, Rottapharm
2; J. Paulino, Rottapharm 2; J. Marenco,
Rottapharm 2; A. Porto, Rottapharm 2; A. Laffon,
Rottapharm 2; D. Araùjo, Rottapharm 2; M.
Figueroa, Rottapharm 2; J. Branco, Rottapharm
2.